Opportunity console

every judgment, as of 2026-06-23 · 12 ranked

#1 · Acme · IT Hardware

score 0.514needs_review

Addressable spend

$1,848,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$92,400–$184,800

via bring_off_contract_under_contract, consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Needs review — cause: thin_spend_coverage

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.370	0.30	0.111	1,848,000	$1,848,000 of addressable spend — 37% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.455	0.20	0.091	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.649	0.25	0.162	1,200,000	65% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	1,940	last sourced 1940 days ago — past the 1095-day stale line, score maxed
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2021-03-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#2 · Staples · Office Supplies

score 0.512high

Addressable spend

$488,600

Est. savings (low–high)

$24,430–$48,860

via bring_off_contract_under_contract, consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.098	0.30	0.029	488,600	$488,600 of addressable spend — 10% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.498	0.20	0.100	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.532	0.25	0.133	260,000	53% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	1,756	last sourced 1756 days ago — past the 1095-day stale line, score maxed
Supply risk	1.000	0.10	0.100	high	supply-risk band "high" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2021-09-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#3 · Constellation · Energy

score 0.482high

Addressable spend

$540,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$16,200–$43,200

via bring_off_contract_under_contract

Recommended action

Bring off-contract spend under an existing agreement

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.108	0.30	0.032	540,000	$540,000 of addressable spend — 11% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	1.000	0.25	0.250	540,000	100% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	0.667	0.15	0.100	844	last sourced 844 days ago
Supply risk	1.000	0.10	0.100	high	supply-risk band "high" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2024-03-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#4 · Umbrella · Marketing

score 0.463high

Addressable spend

$1,028,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$51,400–$102,800

via bring_off_contract_under_contract, consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.206	0.30	0.062	1,028,000	$1,028,000 of addressable spend — 21% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.465	0.20	0.093	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.632	0.25	0.158	650,000	63% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	1,634	last sourced 1634 days ago — past the 1095-day stale line, score maxed
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2022-01-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#5 · Grainger · MRO

score 0.453high

Addressable spend

$874,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$43,700–$87,400

via bring_off_contract_under_contract, consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.175	0.30	0.052	874,000	$874,000 of addressable spend — 17% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.467	0.20	0.093	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.629	0.25	0.157	550,000	63% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	2,213	last sourced 2213 days ago — past the 1095-day stale line, score maxed
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2020-06-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#6 · Stark · Professional Services

score 0.291medium

Addressable spend

$750,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$37,500–$75,000

via consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.150	0.30	0.045	750,000	$750,000 of addressable spend — 15% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.480	0.20	0.096	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	—	never competitively sourced — score maxed
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced never · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#7 · Hertz · Travel

score 0.261medium

Addressable spend

$180,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$7,200–$18,000

via recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Re-compete this category — sourcing is stale

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.036	0.30	0.011	180,000	$180,000 of addressable spend — 4% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	—	never competitively sourced — score maxed
Supply risk	1.000	0.10	0.100	high	supply-risk band "high" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced never · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#8 · Enterprise · Fleet

score 0.251medium

Addressable spend

$405,600

Est. savings (low–high)

$20,280–$40,560

via consolidate_fragmented_spend, recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Consolidate fragmented spend across the supplier family

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.081	0.30	0.024	405,600	$405,600 of addressable spend — 8% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.385	0.20	0.077	2	spread across 2 suppliers; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	—	never competitively sourced — score maxed
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced never · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#9 · Initech · Facilities

score 0.215medium

Addressable spend

$250,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$10,000–$25,000

via recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Re-compete this category — sourcing is stale

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.050	0.30	0.015	250,000	$250,000 of addressable spend — 5% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	—	never competitively sourced — score maxed
Supply risk	0.500	0.10	0.050	medium	supply-risk band "medium" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced never · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#10 · Verizon · Telecom

score 0.213high

Addressable spend

$220,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$8,800–$22,000

via recompete_stale_category

Recommended action

Re-compete this category — sourcing is stale

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.044	0.30	0.013	220,000	$220,000 of addressable spend — 4% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	1.000	0.15	0.150	1,269	last sourced 1269 days ago — past the 1095-day stale line, score maxed
Supply risk	0.500	0.10	0.050	medium	supply-risk band "medium" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2023-01-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#11 · Globex · Logistics

score 0.130high

Addressable spend

$508,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$0–$0

Recommended action

Monitor — covered, consolidated, and recently sourced; no material lever

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.102	0.30	0.030	508,000	$508,000 of addressable spend — 10% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	0.333	0.15	0.050	387	last sourced 387 days ago
Supply risk	0.500	0.10	0.050	medium	supply-risk band "medium" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2025-06-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37

#12 · Flexstaff · Contingent Labor

score 0.118needs_review

Addressable spend

$300,000

Est. savings (low–high)

$0–$0

Recommended action

Monitor — covered, consolidated, and recently sourced; no material lever

Needs review — cause: thin_spend_coverage

Factor	Score	Weight	Contribution	Cited value	What it means
Addressable spend	0.060	0.30	0.018	300,000	$300,000 of addressable spend — 6% of the $5,000,000 cap; a bigger pool scores higher
Fragmentation	0.000	0.20	0.000	1	spread across 1 supplier; a more even split scores higher (more consolidation upside)
Contract leakage	0.000	0.25	0.000	0	0% of spend is off-contract or on an expired agreement
Sourcing age	0.667	0.15	0.100	752	last sourced 752 days ago
Supply risk	0.000	0.10	0.000	low	supply-risk band "low" (pilot uses a deterministic floor, not a live risk feed)

as of 2026-06-23 · config 2026-06-pilot-1 · last sourced 2024-06-01 · snapshot dfe29f1ab5868b9662787a3d319589486e3181d8dadcd5bc693630491f2f7f37